🔗 Share this article

Each time a significant prize-giving event nears, you'll find a demand for the addition fresh award types to honor overlooked contributions and fill the passions of fans dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator has already made supporting a scary games classification. That would rule. So would strategy board titles, representing a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me if I try to elbow in front because like all single-minded supporters, there's a strong justification backing this proposal stands as crucial and significant. This is the request: There should be an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works isn't exact; it remains highly personal, and inevitably spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why cinema institutions don’t do it. Yet it remains an unavoidable compromise within the realm of gaming, which are so diverse they hardly constitute a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to be recognized, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events offer these award types recognizing Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these six categories successfully include a lot of ground, allowing placement for numerous titles.

Different situation exists for puzzle games. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Consider three of outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles of one title, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. Which classification works within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games launched regularly without proper recognition during gaming ceremonies, unless they happen to qualify classification types such as Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

• One classic puzzle game got overlooked for anything in 2014
• Another creative title was excluded in 2019
• Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment recently
• Just some logic titles barely qualified for independent or mobile categories

Importance of Logic Titles

These are often modest productions, but the art behind logic titles is of massive significance. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most popular titles worldwide maintaining this status for an extended period.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with well-known building titles competing to become highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Puzzle games are foundational for gaming as medium, and they are in conversation with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Logic titles wouldn't face such difficulty. You could fill a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences annually without trouble — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these are games lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers operate at the demanding boundary of video game design, creating some of the purest expressions of the video game form. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay 35 years.